Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 2023 Mar 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304031

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An effective vaccine response is currently a critical issue in the control of COVID-19. Little is known about humoral and cellular immunity comparing protein-based vaccine with other types of vaccines. The relevance of basal immunity to antibody production is also unknown. METHODS: Seventy-eight individuals were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome were the level of spike-specific antibodies and neutralizing antibodies measured by ELISA. Secondary measures included memory T cells and basal immunity estimated by flow cytometry and ELISA. Correlations for all parameters were calculated using the nonparametric Spearman correlation method. RESULTS: We observed that two doses of mRNA-based Moderna mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine produced the highest total spike-binding antibody and neutralizing ability against the wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron variants. The protein-based MVC-COV1901 (MVC) vaccine developed in Taiwan produced higher spike-binding antibodies against Delta and Omicron variants and neutralizing ability against the WT strain than the adenovirus-based AstraZeneca-Oxford AZD1222 (AZ) vaccine. Moderna and AZ vaccination produced more central memory T cells in PBMC than the MVC vaccine. However, the MVC vaccine had the lowest adverse effects compared to the Moderna and AZ vaccines. Surprisingly, the basal immunity represented by TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2 prior to vaccination was negatively correlated with the production of spike-binding antibodies and neutralizing ability. CONCLUSION: This study compared memory T cells, total spike-binding antibody levels, and neutralizing capacity against WT, Delta, and Omicron variants between the MVC vaccine and the widely used Moderna and AZ vaccines, which provides valuable information for future vaccine development strategies.

2.
Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi ; 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2282130

ABSTRACT

Background An effective vaccine response is currently a critical issue in the control of COVID-19. Little is known about humoral and cellular immunity comparing protein-based vaccine with other types of vaccines. The relevance of basal immunity to antibody production is also unknown. Methods Seventy-eight individuals were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome were the level of spike-specific antibodies and neutralizing antibodies measured by ELISA. Secondary measures included memory T cells and basal immunity estimated by flow cytometry and ELISA. Correlations for all parameters were calculated using the nonparametric Spearman correlation method. Results We observed that two doses of mRNA-based Moderna mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine produced the highest total spike-binding antibody and neutralizing ability against the wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron variants. The protein-based MVC-COV1901 (MVC) vaccine developed in Taiwan produced higher spike-binding antibodies against Delta and Omicron variants and neutralizing ability against the WT strain than the adenovirus-based AstraZeneca-Oxford AZD1222 (AZ) vaccine. Moderna and AZ vaccination produced more central memory T cells in PBMC than the MVC vaccine. However, the MVC vaccine had the lowest adverse effects compared to the Moderna and AZ vaccines. Surprisingly, the basal immunity represented by TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2 prior to vaccination was negatively correlated with the production of spike-binding antibodies and neutralizing ability. Conclusion This study compared memory T cells, total spike-binding antibody levels, and neutralizing capacity against WT, Delta, and Omicron variants between the MVC vaccine and the widely used Moderna and AZ vaccines, which provides valuable information for future vaccine development strategies.

3.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(4)2022 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1822465

ABSTRACT

Vaccination is the most effective intervention to prevent infection and subsequent complications from SARS-CoV-2. Because of their multiple comorbidities, the elderly population experienced the highest number of deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic. Although in most countries, older people have top priority for COVID-19 vaccines, their actual willingness and attitudes regarding vaccination are still unclear. Thus, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate their willingness, attitudes, awareness, and knowledge of COVID-19 through a web-based questionnaire after the first local outbreak of COVID-19 in Taiwan. A total of 957 questionnaires were completed, and 74.9% of elderly individuals were likely to receive COVID-19 vaccines. The results from a multiple logistic regression demonstrated that older people who need to visit the outpatient department and have a high level of concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines are prone to having a negative willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccines. The following items related to awareness of the COVID-19 pandemic were attributed to the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines: "understanding the risk of being infected by SARS-CoV-2", "understanding the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines", "willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccine for protecting others", and "safety of COVID-19 vaccines is a key factor for you to accept them". Furthermore, a positive association between COVID-19 vaccination and attitudes toward accepting booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine was observed. Our results show that these factors could affect the willingness of older people to accept COVID-19 vaccines and that they are important for policymakers and medical staff to develop vaccination plans during the COVID-19 pandemic.

5.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 12(3): 609-617, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1144432

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We share our strategies for preventing the COVID-19 outbreak in a nursing home in Taiwan. METHODS: We compared the number of outpatient department visits, the days of prescription from the outpatient department, the number of emergency department visits of the nursing home residents and staff, the number of admissions, and the days of admission of the residents for respiratory tract infection treatment between 2019 and 2020 to examine the effect of our preventive measures in the nursing home. Residents and staff who continuously lived and worked in the nursing home from 2019 to 2020 were included. The differences in outcomes between 2019 and 2020 were examined using paired sample t tests. The multivariate analyses were presented through generalized estimating equation analysis. RESULTS: A cohort of 183 residents and 127 staff was included and their electronic medical documentation was analyzed in two periods: January-September 2019 and January-September 2020. These residents had lower numbers of outpatient department visits (P < 0.001), days of prescription from the outpatient department (P < 0.001), number of emergency department visits (P < 0.001), number of admissions (P < 0.001), and days of admission (P < 0.001) to treat respiratory tract infections from January-September 2020 than January-September 2019. These staff members had lower numbers of outpatient department visits (P = 0.015) and days of prescription from the outpatient department (P = 0.009) to treat respiratory tract infections from January-September 2020 than January-September 2019. CONCLUSION: The association between our preventive measures and decreasing the risk of respiratory tract infection in nursing home residents and staff could be found. Sharing these experiences is valuable, as they provide important insights related to clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Infection Control , Nursing Homes , Respiratory Tract Infections , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Homes for the Aged , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Taiwan
6.
Biomolecules ; 10(3)2020 02 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-13514

ABSTRACT

Strobilanthes cusia (Nees) Kuntze is a Chinese herbal medicine used in the treatment of respiratory virus infections. The methanol extract of S. cusia leaf contains chemical components such as ß-sitosterol, indirubin, tryptanthrin, betulin, indigodole A, and indigodole B that have diverse biological activities. However, the antiviral action of S. cusia leaf and its components against human coronavirus remains to be elucidated. Human coronavirus NL63 infection is frequent among immunocompromised individuals, young children, and in the elderly. This study investigated the anti-Human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) activity of the methanol extract of S. cusia leaf and its major components. The methanol extract of S. cusia leaf effectively inhibited the cytopathic effect (CPE) and virus yield (IC50 = 0.64 µg/mL) in HCoV-NL63-infected cells. Moreover, this extract potently inhibited the HCoV-NL63 infection in a concentration-dependent manner. Among the six components identified in the methanol extract of S. cusia leaf, tryptanthrin and indigodole B (5aR-ethyltryptanthrin) exhibited potent antiviral activity in reducing the CPE and progeny virus production. The IC50 values against virus yield were 1.52 µM and 2.60 µM for tryptanthrin and indigodole B, respectively. Different modes of time-of-addition/removal assay indicated that tryptanthrin prevented the early and late stages of HCoV-NL63 replication, particularly by blocking viral RNA genome synthesis and papain-like protease 2 activity. Notably, tryptanthrin (IC50 = 0.06 µM) and indigodole B (IC50 = 2.09 µM) exhibited strong virucidal activity as well. This study identified tryptanthrin as the key active component of S. cusia leaf methanol extract that acted against HCoV-NL63 in a cell-type independent manner. The results specify that tryptanthrin possesses antiviral potential against HCoV-NL63 infection.


Subject(s)
Acanthaceae/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Coronavirus NL63, Human/physiology , Quinazolines/pharmacology , Virus Internalization/drug effects , Acanthaceae/metabolism , Animals , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/isolation & purification , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cell Line , Cell Survival/drug effects , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Coronavirus NL63, Human/isolation & purification , Humans , Macaca mulatta , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Leaves/chemistry , Plant Leaves/metabolism , Quinazolines/chemistry , Quinazolines/isolation & purification , Quinazolines/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL